Topic: Constitutional Issues
Murder for Hire In Santa Cruz - The Curious Career of Irwin Joseph We
know that the Greed People are growing daily more desperate; it was not
their original plans that are tripping them up but the cover ups that
followed. Watch Santa Cruz and the unfolding story of Clive Boustred.
It matters to all of us.by Melinda Pillsbury-Foster
(Libertarian)
Thursday, May 22, 2008
Many
in Santa Cruz, California refer to Commissioner, Irwin H. Joseph as,
"Junk Justice Joseph." On a local forum his many errors, omissions and
habits are discussed, the details striking the reader as simple
sloppiness.
Those who complain about the rulings coming from Joseph also note
that he seems completely ignorant of the Constitution, ignoring the
rights secured to individuals through the documents that, presumably,
every American should understand. In a recent case involving the rights
of the homeless in Santa Cruz Joseph ignored the law suit brought by
local civil rights attorneys Paul Sanford and Kate Wells announcing
that he had, "made up his mind,," regarding the rights of homeless to free expression, ignoring the previous opinion of the appeal court.
That issue was thrown into high visibility in Santa Cruz when one
homeless man, Robert Wagner, died sitting up in his wheelchair, unable
to lay down and so save his own life. While the onlooker is tempted to
lay all of the blame on Irwin Joseph that is a condemnation that should
be more carefully apportioned.
Irwin Joseph is only a Commissioner. The role of commissioner has
been described by one judge slightly south of Santa Cruz as, "a rent a
cop; sort of like comparing real police to the guy who walks around the
parking lot." Additionally, Irwin Joseph, formerly a real estate
attorney, has no oath on file at the Courthouse, unlike those elected
to judgeships. This was ascertained just today. All other such
officials had their oaths on file. Without that oath, signed and dated,
the person on the bench is outside the law. Regrettably, there is no
reason to believe that will bother those who control the courts in
Santa Cruz either.
Why do real judges, the local council and others, presumably better
informed, tolerate the presence of Joseph on the bench acting in all
ways as one of them? That is one question that needs answering. But one
answer immediately suggests itself.
Greed explains many things.
In Santa Cruz, where Robert Wagner died on the street, another man
is locked in a struggle involving Irwin Joseph. The second man may well
be murdered through the active participation of Joseph.
Joseph managed to acquire the position of Commissioner in Santa Cruz
not through his demonstrated excellence but through his willingness to
do as he is told. His lovely home and comfortable life style mean
everything to him. He let Wagner die, one kind of murder for hire. Now
his comforts and status are threatened if another man is able to invoke
the protections of the Constitution and stay alive.
Clive Boustred headed a company that challenged the grip held by the
Federal Reserve Bank on money. InfoTelesys, the company he founded,
threatened the perpetual profit machine that has for over a century
pumped unearned trillions into the bank accounts of a small group of
people, fewer than 100,000 individuals. It surprised Boustred to learn
after their satellite based system was launched, that the FED is a
private corporation that issues money that mortgages the lives of
Americans through fractional reserve banking. Then it began to sink in.
He learned the facts after the first murder attempt, carried out by
Santa Cruz's Sheriff Department in 2002. Unarmed and in the act of
driving up to his home with his children in the car, Boustred was
targeted by a sharpshooter. The shooter missed; taking aim from 7 feet
away the deputy sheriff put the bullet through the car, missing
Boustred and his small son who was seated beside him. In the daylight
of a sunny afternoon the situation did not go unnoticed. The deputy
sheriff, preparing for a second shot, stopped only when his supervisor
intervened having noticed neighbors watching.
Today, InfoTelesys is on hold. Over the last years Boustred has
warded off two more assassination attempts and now faces another that
may well take place as planned this Friday. In each instance the attack
came through the legal system, using the personnel paid for by tax
payers but arrayed against him by the local judicial system through the
collusion of Joseph, among others.
This Friday Boustred faces eviction from his home, an event timed to
coincide with a long awaited court date aimed at taking Commissioner
Irwin Joseph off his case. The eviction is unwarranted and illegal,
taking place through edicts issued by Joseph and unsupported by law.
Billions of dollars are at stake.
Boustred has not been idle. Law suits that awarded Boustred, by
default, funds of 60 billion dollars in restitution from Santa Cruz,
The State of California, and the United States government wait to be
paid. Joseph and his cronies know that new legal action by Boustred is
in the works.
Irwin Joseph and others found the perfect weapon in Boustred's
former wife. Anamaria stands to profit from a life insurance policy
worth a million dollars if Clive Boustred dies next Friday in a rain of
bullets. If he lives and manages to force compliance with the original
settlement agreement she will owe him hundreds of thousands of dollars.
Anamaria, who later married the man, her lover, who helped her empty
the family's bank accounts has motive. To save herself Anamaria wants
Boustred dead.
Those who are taking aim at Boustred in Santa Cruz are, themselves, felons, traitors to the Constitution.
The question that is beginning to confront Americans, right, left,
and never thought about it, is the agenda behind the actions undertaken
by those who, to serve in public office, are obligated to uphold the
Constitution and our rights. Across America today the Constitution
along with Boustred, is under attack.
In the measures passed by Congress as H.B. 1955 and S.B. 1959, The Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act of 2007 was
written, passed, and signed into law for a purpose. Since the weight of
evidence from a broad range of sources now give the lie to the idea
that there has been any terrorism not initiated by those in power,
Americans would be well advised to consider the reasons behind this
measure along with the militarization of police across the country.
We have been moved from government in the hands of the people to
government for the profit of those who hold power. The Constitution
interferes with that agenda.
Today in America as few as 10% of those holding public office
fulfill the Constitutional and legal obligation to sign the written
oath promising they will uphold the foundations of American law. Around
the same percentage post the bond also required. Instead, you, the
taxpayer pay the costs when they are found culpable.
The failure to sign the oath, which is then kept on file with the
Secretary of State and the County Recorder, is a misdemeanor until the
fact is called to attention. When the individual is noticed the offense
becomes a felony. Officials guilty of the crime of failing to sign the
oath may never again legally serve in a position of public trust. They
are to be ejected from office, according to law. They are also liable
for damages, including the cost of relitigating and the costs of
decisions made while they were illegally occupying the office.
As much as 90% of those presently occupying offices of public trust
are therefore criminals aside from the corruption that is also endemic.
Why would so many fail to carry out a requirement that is so simple?
The answer is easy. Displacing the Constitution makes them arrogant and
so their arrogance makes them sloppy, as sloppy as Irwin Joseph is
himself
The Constitution, easily understood, short, and focused on the
rights of individuals, is not open to manipulation. The Constitution
mandates accountability; the concept of sovereign immunity for those in
power is alien to its precepts and absent from its text.
From cases involving the rights of the homeless to agencies that
take children out of homes to be cycled into a system that first
generates income from their presence in that system and then sells
children into adoptions, the porn industry and as sexual slaves, every
point that could be converted to unearned income has been covered.
Through a family law system, through the whole regulatory grid the
potential for moving money from the hands of those who earned it to
those who hungered for the means to steal without having to lift a gun
in honest theft, every base has been covered.
When there is that much money at stake it was a natural extension to
use the same system, tuned for taking, into the means to keep the money
rolling in.
Taking back government into their own hands is a challenge that now nakedly confronts all Americans. And that is the reason The Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act of 2007 was written. At any costs those in power know that they must make us afraid to rely on and use the Constitution.
To be a Constitutionalist, to affirm the foundation of American
thought and government is being converted from the ultimate patriotism
to a form of terrorism according to those in Congress and the president
now in office. By those standards every single one of our Founders was
a Home Grown Terrorist. When you understand the agenda of those in
power, to strip Americans of their fortunes, their lives, and their
freedom, it is painfully clear why they view the Constitution with such
ceaseless hostility.
Despite what those in control say the Constitution remains the tool
that keeps America free. But to do that it must be used. Those in
positions of public trust must understand their obligation and be bound
to keep their oaths. How to change the present trajectory and return
America to government by the people, using the Constitution, Common Law
and Common Law courts, is the challenge we now face. The statute that
made signing the Oath mandatory was the first measure passed by
Congress after the Constitution was ratified. It was one of the bricks
in the foundation of law they built for a free people.
Many are now taking up the work that must be done. Ensuring that
those allowed to remain in positions of public trust affirm and uphold
the Constitution must become an immediate concern, calling Americans to
action.
Don Rogers, former California State Senator, known to his many
supporters as, "Mr. Real Conservative," commented that there needs to
be a reawakening, that, "Most of those in office today hate and fear
the Constitution." Former Senator Rogers has founded a Committee to
Restore the Constitution. The group is urging that no candidate for
office receive support without having passed a test on the Constitution
and Common Law, demonstrating that they understand how it works in the
hands of the people. Without that certification no voter, Rogers said,
should vote for any candidate.
Knowing the Constitution is an essential for anyone employed by the
public. For a commissioner or judge it is more. It is the law.
California Code Of Civil Procedure CCP Section 170.6, (a) are explicit.
They state, "Any party to or any attorney appearing in any action or
proceeding may establish this prejudice by an oral or written motion
without notice supported by affidavit or declaration under penalty of
perjury or an oral statement under oath that the judge, court
commissioner, or referee before whom the action or proceeding is
pending or to whom it is assigned is prejudiced against any party or
attorney or the interest of the party or attorney so that the party or
attorney cannot or believes that he or she cannot have a fair and
impartial trial or hearing before the judge, court commissioner, or
referee."
On the same day that Irwin Joseph is scheduled to 'hear' the issue
of an illegal eviction against Boustred Joseph faces a judgment in the
case Boustred won by default, cited above, for billions of dollars. If
there was ever a conflict of interest that defines it. Boustred has
tried to recuse Irwin Joseph every single time he has heard this
ongoing case; every time Joseph and his 'associates' in Santa Cruz
ignore the law. No commissioner, even if he has signed the oath, can,
by law hear a case when one of the parties objects.
And today Jackie, the assistant in Judge Ronald White's office in
the U. S. District Court called to tell Boustred, "as a courtesy," that
Irwin Joseph had not been properly noticed when the noticing had taken
place in court by a third party. White, according to Jackie, wants to
decide the outcome of the hearing on Friday in advance of a hearing
taking place. One might expect that their next move will be to decide
to simply transfer the title of Boustred's 19 acre estate into their
own names after they shoot him to death and Anamaria collects the
million dollars.
There are many reasons that the powers that be in Santa Cruz, and
elsewhere, want Clive Boustred dead. He threatened their con game; he
will not shut up. Having lived a life free of graft and corruption they
have nothing they can use to blackmail him into silence. Remember this
and arm yourself with the Constitution. It works when enough of us
understand and come together.
Did you like this article? If you did, Thumb It! 5 thumbs so far
2008 Melinda Pillsbury-Foster, all rights reserved.
Published: Thursday, May 22, 2008
Last modified: Thursday, May 22, 2008
The views expressed in this
article are those of Melinda Pillsbury-Foster only and do not represent
the views of Nolan Chart, LLC or its affiliates. Melinda Pillsbury-Foster is
solely responsible for the contents of this article and is not an
employee or otherwise affiliated with Nolan Chart, LLC in his/her role as a columnist.
Want to comment on this
article? Leave your comment here. Your email address is
required to track your comment. However, we will neither
publish your email address nor distribute it to other
organizations or persons. The only reason we might use
it would be if we needed to contact you regarding your
comment. All comments are subject to our
terms of use policy.